|
The beautiful view from the boat |
Last week, we officially wrapped up the
2013 flagging season. We completed the last round of water sampling on the
Charles River on Wednesday morning. This time, we shared the river with more
rowers than usual, who were probably preparing for the Head of the Charles regatta.
As we drove the boat down the Charles towards the Longfellow Bridge, I reflected
on my experience doing the flagging sampling. If I could summarize my overall
experience in two words, they would be: memorable and meaningful. In fact,
although I had prior experience conducting water sampling, this was my first
time sampling in the middle of a river, rather than on the banks. Moreover,
this experience helped me visualize everything I learned about the Charles
River in my Water Quality Control class last year.
|
Ali and I on my first day on the river |
|
Ali taking a water sample at the Longfellow Bridge |
CRWA conducts the flagging program every
year from early July through mid-October to provide the public with up-to-date
water quality information for the Lower Charles River Basin. This is done on a daily basis through
the website, phone hotline, and email list. The flagging program was designed
to evaluate whether or not bacteria and cyanobacteria levels in the Charles River
meet state health standards. Water samples are collected at four locations
along the river twice a week and sent out to a lab to be analyzed for Escherichia coli (E. coli). E. coli is a species in the fecal coliform group used to indicate the presence of pathogenic
microorganisms that inhabit in the intestinal tract of warm-blooded animals. The
presence of E. coli in the water
indicates recent contamination from human or animal waste. The US EPA
recommends E. coli as a better
indicator of health risk for recreational waters (US EPA 1986). In addition to
the weekly sampling, a statistical model was developed by CRWA to give a conservative
estimate of water quality conditions. For more information about the flagging
program, visit the Water Quality page on CRWA website.
|
Cristina driving the boat |
Taking everything into account, the water
quality was generally satisfactory this year. Compared to last year’s sampling
program, more blue flags were predicted by the model this time around.
The highest concentrations of E. coli
at all four sampling locations were noted on July 24th, 2013. In
this instance, red flags, indicating potential health risks, were
predicted by the model. This may have been the consequence of heavy rainfall, which may have resulted
in the introduction of pollutants into the river from storm drains and combined
sewer overflows. Besides, a discharge from the MWRA Cottage Farm Pretreatment
Facility was noted on that day.
|
My first time driving a boat :-) |
Although there are many challenges
facing the Charles daily, CRWA has come up with a practical means to evaluate its water
quality to protect river users from potential health risks: the flagging
program. As mentioned previously, it has been a real pleasure to be part of this
year’s sampling team. I have enjoyed every moment on the river. It made me
purposeful and happy to be part of a team that aims to protect human health and
the environment. I am truly going to miss those beautiful sunny days on the
river.
|
I am going to miss them too :-( |
-Awa
References:
US EPA, 1986. Ambient water quality criteria for bacteria. Report Number EPA440/5-84/002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
No comments:
Post a Comment